Segment comparison

Wealth Management Revenue: JPMorgan vs Bank of America

JPMorgan Asset & Wealth Management vs Bank of America's Global Wealth & Investment Management revenue from SEC filings. The same FTE-basis caveat as consumer banking applies.

No data points to chart yet.

Awaiting data

JPM — Asset & Wealth Management: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.
BAC — Global Wealth & Investment Management: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.

Methodology

Revenue concepts only: a member is charted only when its underlying XBRL concept is revenue and its dimension type is chart-eligible — member mapping alone is not enough. Each company's latest annual period is its own fiscal year (fiscal years differ: e.g. Target's FY2026 ends 2026-01-31, Broadcom's FY2025 ends 2025-11-02). Rollup parents and children are never charted together; multi-dimension leaves are charted as their own series; geography buckets are exposure comparisons and never sum to a world total.

Concept: total revenue net of interest expense, with the FTE-basis difference below.

Footnotes

Bank of America reports on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis; JPMorgan does not.

Research these companies

JPM research BAC research

Segment figures come from SEC EDGAR filings. Fiscal years differ by company. Informational only, not investment advice.