Segment comparison

Value-Added Services Revenue: Visa vs Mastercard

Value-added services revenue for Visa and Mastercard from SEC filings. Core network and payment-processing revenue is excluded because the two filers do not tag it comparably.

No data points to chart yet.

Awaiting data

V — Value-Added Services: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.
MA — Value-added services and solutions: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.

Methodology

Revenue concepts only: a member is charted only when its underlying XBRL concept is revenue and its dimension type is chart-eligible — member mapping alone is not enough. Each company's latest annual period is its own fiscal year (fiscal years differ: e.g. Target's FY2026 ends 2026-01-31, Broadcom's FY2025 ends 2025-11-02). Rollup parents and children are never charted together; multi-dimension leaves are charted as their own series; geography buckets are exposure comparisons and never sum to a world total.

Core payments got no bucket: Mastercard's ma:PaymentNetworkMember has no matching Visa total member (Visa splits network revenue into service, data processing, and international transaction components).

Footnotes

Core network/payment-processing revenue is not comparable (Visa splits it into components; Mastercard reports one Payment network member) — this comparison covers value-added services only.

Research these companies

V research MA research

Segment figures come from SEC EDGAR filings. Fiscal years differ by company. Informational only, not investment advice.