Segment comparison

Cloud Infrastructure Revenue: AWS vs Google Cloud vs Azure

Cloud infrastructure revenue for AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft's Intelligent Cloud from SEC filings. Azure is not separately tagged in XBRL, so Intelligent Cloud is the documented proxy.

No data points to chart yet.

Awaiting data

AMZN — AWS: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.
GOOGL — Google Cloud: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.
MSFT — Intelligent Cloud: segment data has not been published yet. This comparison fills in automatically once the backfill lands.

Methodology

Revenue concepts only: a member is charted only when its underlying XBRL concept is revenue and its dimension type is chart-eligible — member mapping alone is not enough. Each company's latest annual period is its own fiscal year (fiscal years differ: e.g. Target's FY2026 ends 2026-01-31, Broadcom's FY2025 ends 2025-11-02). Rollup parents and children are never charted together; multi-dimension leaves are charted as their own series; geography buckets are exposure comparisons and never sum to a world total.

Microsoft has no pure-Azure XBRL member, so the Intelligent Cloud reportable segment (Azure + Server) is the canonical proxy.

Footnotes

Azure is not separately tagged in XBRL, so Microsoft's Intelligent Cloud reportable segment (Azure + Server products, including on-premises server revenue) is the canonical proxy.

Research these companies

AMZN research GOOGL research MSFT research

Segment figures come from SEC EDGAR filings. Fiscal years differ by company. Informational only, not investment advice.